Language for the way Home A survivor-formed lexicon of presence and return
a theology of presence and movement — mission born among survivors, formed in the field, where trauma is met, stories are found, and healing becomes the language of return.
🎧
Listen before you
Read.
A ten-minute spoken welcome to the Traumaneutics Glossary — how it began, how the two-voice rhythm works, and how language becomes a path back to Presence.
The Glossary of Return: Language for the way home
God led me to write a whole volume like this because trauma steals language. Somewhere between experience and words, between what happened and what can be spoken, the thread of meaning frays. Many of us live in that space—knowing what we feel but unable to name it. The wound becomes a silence that keeps repeating.
Trauma fragments the self and the sentence at the same time. When memory and speech are separated, even prayer feels foreign; the mouth forgets how to tell the story. This glossary was born as a bridge—a way for experience and language to find each other again in the presence of God. Each entry is a small act of recovery: a word brought back from exile.
The Spirit asked that it be written in fragments because that’s how trauma speaks. These short pieces are not diluted theology; they are theology written at the body’s pace. They let faith and psychology share the same breath. Brevity is not reduction; it’s reverence for those who can only hold a sentence at a time. God still inhabits small spaces.
The Purpose
This glossary holds the language of return and release—not as spectacle, but as survivor-informed witness. These are the nouns and verbs that let breath return where it was withheld. They name what the system would not. But in naming, they also protect: not all silence is rejection, not all delay is absence. Let each entry be a door, not a verdict. Spiral through, with pause. Some things are true. And also—we attend to our process.
How to Read It This is not a list of definitions. It is not an academic appendix or a theological add-on. It is a justice document. A liberation tool. A witness structure.
These words were shaped in the field—among those whose language was stolen, shattered, silenced, or only ever half-formed. For many, they will not sound new; they will feel like mirrors to something the body already knows. This glossary is for the trauma-formed, the silenced, the spiralled, the survivors—and I will not pretend otherwise. It isn’t arranged by alphabet or theme; it moves the way trauma arrives: fragmented, raw, human, fierce, alive and sometimes, even with humour.
Read it like conversation. Or like confession. Or like a field you’re walking through. There’s no wrong way in.
You will not find easy synonyms here. You will find fragments, phrases, lived syntax. Some entries are short because the bodies they serve cannot stay long. The fragments are not confusion—they are kindness. They are not incoherent—they are mercy shaped for a fragmented mind. Survivor-brain doesn’t need a lecture to feel known; it needs a sentence it can breathe inside. A breadcrumb that invites more without overwhelming. A phrase that holds the weight of lived experience and still offers a path forward.These entries are spiralled. You can return to them. They will sound different the second time, and the third. They will not punish you for needing to return.Theology and RestorationThis glossary is also an act of restoration. Trauma doesn’t only damage the body; it steals vocabulary. It makes us doubt our own sense-making. Many of us learned to speak only through silence, side-speech, sensation, or coded fragments. This glossary says:
You were never voiceless. You were speaking in spiral. No one translated. Until now.Language will return, and when it does, it will not sound like it used to. It will carry presence, not performance.Jesus consistently took language—whether drawn from empire, religion, economy, or shame—and filled it with mercy. He didn’t reject words; he reclaimed them. He entered their distortion and restored their dignity. He created a new grammar for the Kingdom.
Kingdom — once the vocabulary of Caesar, now yeast, seed, and child.
Father (Abba) — once formal and distant, now intimacy and nearness.
Peace — once enforced silence, now breath that co-regulates fear.
Clean / unclean — once exclusion, now belonging.
Blessed — once privilege, now solidarity.
Debt / forgiveness — once transaction, now mercy.
Son of Man — once domination, now vulnerability.
What Jesus did with language is what we are doing here. We are reclaiming words—some that were used against us, some that never included us, some that lived only in our bodies as sensation or side-speech. This glossary is not simply about terms; it is about returning agency, voice, and definition to those who were spoken about, over, or around.
Some words are reclaimed. Some repurposed. Some brand-new, because what we carry has never been named before.
This is the sacred work of a people who are not asking permission to speak. We are naming what has been unsaid. We are giving back language to silenced places. We are following the Jesus-way—naming things differently, because the old names harmed us.
And now—we speak. In fragments. In fire. In full.
Language Beyond Words
Some entries use emojis or visual symbols. That isn’t decoration or branding; it’s recognition. Many of us have always spoken in images, shapes, or side-codes because traditional language was unsafe or unavailable. Art and symbol are legitimate grammars of experience. You are not outside the field because you think in pictures. Presence arrives in shape too.
An Invitation
This glossary is not closed. It is not mine alone. Like any living language, it grows through shared use, shared breath, shared witness.
If there’s a phrase your body knows, a coded word that needs to be included, you are welcome to write to me. Traumaneutics® belongs to a global movement reclaiming the vocabulary of healing and faith. Every contribution will be discerned in community, tested in the field, and returned to the page as shared language.Read slowly. Start anywhere. Stop whenever the breath says enough. These words will be waiting when you return. The Two Voice Rythmn of the Glossary
Each entry in this glossary is written as conversation, not correction.
While the glossary can be used on its own, it is also designed to function as an index into the wider Traumaneutics field. Language is the primary entry point, because language is where recognition begins. From there, the work opens outward. Over time, individual terms will link into teaching, practice, and formation, not as a linear pathway but as a network. People do not move through this field in the same order or at the same pace. Some will remain with language for a long time. Others will follow a term outward into deeper theological reflection, field-based practice, or communal formation when and if they are ready. This structure is intentional. It resists sequencing that requires readiness to be proven in advance. It allows people to enter through recognition rather than compliance, and to move outward through curiosity rather than obligation. Language does not funnel people toward a prescribed outcome; it creates multiple points of orientation within a shared field. In this way, the glossary does not stand apart from the wider work, nor does it exhaust it. It functions as field infrastructure: stable enough to stand alone, porous enough to connect, and responsive enough to grow as the field itself develops.
Terms found here will link outward over time, connecting language to deeper reflection, practice, and formation. The glossary and connected Field & Teaching is updated at human speed. New language appears as it is thought, tested, and lived, not all at once or in advance. What is published reflects what can be named responsibly in real time.
Living Language and an Unrecognised People Group
Language does not remain static. It lives through shared use, shared testing, and shared recognition. Words that matter are not created fully formed; they grow through encounter. They are refined when people recognise themselves in them, adjust them, resist them, and carry them forward together. This is especially true for communities whose experiences have not been consistently named, recorded, or believed. Trauma-formed people function, in many contexts, as an unrecognised people group. Not because of shared culture, geography, or visible markers, but because of shared patterns of perception, regulation, relational injury, and survival. This people group does not have a phenotype. Its members are often dispersed, misclassified, and undocumented. As a result, the language available to describe trauma has largely been developed about this group rather than with it. That language often comes from: clinical settings, institutional frameworks, or explanatory models designed for observers rather than participants.
While some of this language is useful, much of it does not belong to trauma-formed people themselves. It can feel borrowed, flattening, or subtly disempowering. It may describe experience accurately while still failing to honour the intelligence, agency, and discernment of those who live it. Traumaneutics begins from a different assumption: A people group that has been historically unnamed cannot rely solely on inherited language to secure justice, coherence, or recognition. Language must be developed from within.
Why Language Must Belong to the People Who Use It
When a people group does not have language that belongs to them: experience remains private, harm remains difficult to challenge, and injustice remains easy to deny.
This is not because trauma-formed people lack insight, but because insight without shared language cannot circulate. It cannot be recognised by others, and it cannot be carried beyond the individual body. Developing a shared language is therefore not a matter of branding or internal cohesion. It is a matter of epistemic survival. Language that belongs to trauma-formed people: reflects lived reality rather than theoretical ideals, names patterns without moralising them, allows complexity without requiring self-justification, and protects against misclassification.
Such language does not ask people to explain themselves into credibility. It provides credibility in advance.
The Glossary as a Living, Shared Work
For this reason, the Traumaneutics glossary is intentionally treated as living language, not a closed work. Terms here are offered as: provisional, responsive, and open to refinement through shared use.
They are tested not by theoretical elegance, but by whether they: reduce isolation ,increase recognition, slow harmful interpretation, and support dignity.
As trauma-formed people use this language — in reflection, conversation, training, and practice — it will evolve with us. Some terms will settle. Others will be challenged, adapted, or replaced. That process is not a weakness of the work; it is evidence that the language is alive. Ownership of this language does not rest with institutions, clinicians, or interpreters standing at a distance. It rests with those whose bodies, histories, and relationships recognise the patterns being named.
Why This Matters for Justice
Justice does not begin with policy or intervention. It begins with recognition. Recognition requires language that can be shared without distortion. Until such language exists, trauma-formed people remain visible only as individuals, not as a people group whose experiences reveal systemic patterns. This glossary exists to interrupt that invisibility. By developing language that belongs to trauma-formed people — language that can be used without apology or translation — it creates the conditions for justice to move beyond individual explanation toward collective recognition. In this sense, living language is not a supplement to justice. It is one of its foundations.
A people group without language remains unrecognised. This glossary exists so trauma-formed people do not have to remain so.
The Glossary As A Justice Tool
This glossary is not neutral. It is not simply a list of terms used within the Traumaneutics framework (although it also is), and it is not intended as abstract language play or academic taxonomy. It exists because justice cannot respond to what remains unnamed. In trauma contexts, experience often lives below language. People know something is wrong, harmful, or unjust, but lack words that hold the experience accurately without distortion, minimisation, or shame. When there is no shared vocabulary, harm remains private and responsibility remains diffuse. This glossary addresses that gap. By naming recurring patterns of experience, power, presence, and injury, it makes what is often felt but unspeakable available for recognition. Recognition is the first movement of justice.
Why Naming Is Not Cosmetic
Naming is often misunderstood as labelling or categorisation. In trauma-formed systems, naming is more fundamental than that. Without language: experience cannot be shared, patterns cannot be recognised, accountability cannot be activated, and repair cannot begin.
Justice rarely fails because people do not care. It fails because there is no stable language for what is happening. This glossary provides language before people are asked to speak, explain, or justify themselves. It allows experience to be held in abstraction first, so it does not have to be carried alone in the body.
Trauma and Wordless Injustice
Trauma frequently disrupts narrative coherence. People may experience: bodily knowing without explanation,emotional response without storyline,harm that is sensed but difficult to articulate.
In these conditions, demands for clarity, evidence, or calm articulation can become further sources of harm. The absence of language is then misread as exaggeration, overreaction, or confusion. This glossary resists that misclassification. It treats wordlessness not as deficit, but as a signal that language has not yet been made available. Providing language in advance is a form of protection.
How This Glossary Is Intended to Function
The terms here are not prescriptions. They are not diagnoses. They are not accusations. They are tools for recognition. People may encounter a word and recognise their experience immediately. Others may circle a term over time. Some may never use the language explicitly, but find relief in knowing that what they experience has a name. The glossary is designed to: slow interpretation, prevent premature judgement, and interrupt flattening explanations.
In this sense, it functions as pre-interpretive, pre-institutional justice — making reality visible before meaning, judgement or action is imposed. It is a 'upstream justice' (systems theory), establishing shared recognition.
When recognition is shared, experience no longer has to be privately interpreted. What was previously held as sensation, pattern, or unease becomes available for collective understanding without being translated into testimony or defence. This does not require disclosure. It establishes reality without forcing explanation. Shared recognition changes how meaning forms. When language exists for a pattern, interpretation slows. The demand to justify, clarify, or respond immediately loses its urgency. Misreading becomes less likely because the pattern is already intelligible. Secondary harm, produced by premature judgement or correction, is reduced. This is the condition under which structural responsibility becomes visible. Once a pattern is recognised, responsibility no longer defaults to the person who was harmed. It locates instead with those who hold power to change conditions, interrupt repetition, or enable repair. Accountability shifts from individual explanation to structural response. Shared recognition also clarifies the difference between responsibility and agency. Those affected are not assigned responsibility for what occurred. They retain agency to choose whether, when, and how to act, speak, or remain silent, without being misread as passive or complicit. This is what 'upstream justice' establishes. Understanding precedes action. Silence is no longer interpreted as consent. Those with authority are required to respond proportionately, and those without power are no longer burdened with responsibility that was never theirs. Language does not resolve injustice. It makes injustice recognisable enough for responsibility to rest where it belongs, and for agency to remain with those who were affected.
Glossary: language for return
Search any word, phrase, or idea — the teaching that helped, the glossary term you half-remember, or the thing you’d like to find again just to disagree with. Whatever it brings up — it’s okay to return.
Search this Glossary
🔇 Voice Threat Reflex (n.)
Definition: The body’s learned fear of speaking truth because truth once triggered danger.
Main entry: When voice and consequence were fused, even safety can feel like risk. The Voice Threat Reflex is not hesitation—it’s memory. The nervous system remembers every punishment attached to honesty, every silence that kept you alive. This reflex is the echo of that survival. It activates even in safety, whispering, Be careful. Don’t say it like that. Healing begins when someone’s presence proves that voice and danger are no longer the same.
Tagline: "I’m not afraid of you. I’m remembering the last time I spoke."
Definition: A posture of staying-with that protects without silencing and names truth without harm.
Fierce Presence is what trauma needs most: a witness who says no more harm and I’m still here in the same breath. It holds boundaries like doors, not walls. It’s love with backbone—gentle but unmoved. Fierce Presence doesn’t demand performance or retreat; it simply refuses disappearance. It’s not confrontation for its own sake—it’s compassion that has learned to roar softly.
Tagline: "I won’t let you burn the house down—and I won’t leave you on the porch."
Definition: The discipline of remaining present inside unfinished revelation—holding what’s half-arrived until it breathes all the way through.
Mid-Gate Fidelity is the opposite of closure. It refuses to finalise what God is still forming. In trauma-formed lives, waiting mid-gate can feel unbearable; everything in us wants the conclusion that proves safety. But fidelity here means staying inside the shimmer until the breath completes the sentence. You cannot file what is still forming. You cannot seal what is still shimmering.
Tagline: "I can organise anything—except the breath that hasn’t finished speaking."
Definition: The survival-shaped instinct to move from activation straight to action—skipping the pauses where safety, grief, or truth should settle.
When safety was never modelled, the body learns to hurry. It moves from shock to service, from awareness to collapse, bypassing the gates that regulate breath and belonging. Gate-Skip Reflex isn’t disobedience—it’s history playing out at speed. The nervous system remembers what was unsafe to feel and leaps over it. Healing begins when we notice the skipped gate and dare to wait there.
Tagline: "I didn’t rush because I’m impatient—I rushed because stopping once cost me."
Definition: The revisiting of failure and shame through grace—the moment Jesus re-lights the coals where Peter once denied Him.
The Second Fire is breakfast after betrayal. It’s not the bonfire of performance but the small fire of forgiveness. Jesus didn’t build a stage; He built a fire and cooked. To sit there is to face what you feared without flinching. The Second Fire burns quieter than the first—it doesn’t demand repentance; it invites recognition. Healing happens when you can eat where you once ran.
Tagline: "The same place I failed became the place He fed me."
Definition: To carry the rhythm of Jesus’ post-resurrection meal—mission that feeds before it speaks.
To go breakfast-shaped is to be sent with tenderness. It’s the opposite of platform—it’s sustenance on the shore. Jesus didn’t relaunch His ministry with a sermon; He made food. This verb reminds the sent ones that mission begins with nourishment, not noise. To go breakfast-shaped means to offer warmth before wisdom and bread before belief.
Tagline: "He fed them before He re-commissioned them."
Definition: The act of naming male vulnerability and trauma within church systems that preferred silence over truth.
This phrase names the moment a man tells the truth in a room built to ignore him. The stained glass shatters not from rebellion but from revelation. Breaking the Stained Glass Window is what happens when hidden pain refuses to stay decorative. It’s not destruction; it’s deliverance. The pieces that fall aren’t fragments of failure—they’re light finding new ways in.
Tagline: "The glass didn’t break from anger. It broke from truth finally being allowed to speak."
Definition: The protective posture of presence that shields without controlling and stays without silencing.
Apostolic Covering is not hierarchy—it’s hospitality. It stands near enough to protect but far enough to let others breathe. It doesn’t hover or fix; it guards dignity and space. True covering doesn’t demand permission to stay—it earns it through tenderness and time. In trauma-shaped community, this is how safety becomes structure.
Tagline: "Covering isn’t control. It’s love that knows how to stay."
Companion entry: Breaking the Stained Glass Window
Definition: The embodied instinct that recognises when a meal served under the banner of fellowship isn’t safe, sacred, or loving.
Some of us learned early that not every table was kind. We smiled through meals that carried shame instead of nourishment. Potluck Chicken Discernment is that survivor instinct that quietly says, “Something here isn’t love.” It isn’t rebellion—it’s wisdom. The body remembers when hospitality was performative and safety was missing. Refusing to eat what isn’t safe isn’t rudeness; it’s reverence for the body that stayed alive.
Tagline: "I wouldn’t eat the chicken. I knew it might kill me. And I wasn’t wrong."
Definition: The refusal to choose between reverence and honesty—holding space for joy and truth at the same table.
This ethic dismantles false binaries. You can receive food with gratitude and still name when love is missing. You can eat with reverence and still call absence what it is. The Yes and Yes Table reminds us that sacred hospitality doesn’t silence discernment; it invites it. Jesus broke bread with those who misunderstood Him and still told the truth. So do we.
Tagline: "I’ve eaten fish heads in love and turned down feasts in silence."
For the trauma-formed, memory hides in flavour, texture, and smell. A meal can become a flashback; a spoonful can open years. Mouth Memory names that encoded ache without shame. It is the body’s archive, still fluent when speech collapses. Healing begins the moment someone believes the memory of the mouth.
Tagline: “My body remembers—even if I never said it out loud.”
This is resurrection through the senses: the first bite that doesn’t trigger flight, the meal that lands without collapse. Taste Return is theology you can chew. It’s not metaphor—it’s the body trusting love enough to swallow again. The table becomes the teacher, and nourishment turns into worship.
Definition: A rhythm for testing whether a feedback gate is clear.
This flow begins with breath. Before speaking, the witness asks seven questions—Who, Why, How, Power, Safety, Use, Truth. If any remain fogged, silence stands guard. In trauma-informed communication, withholding speech is not avoidance; it is reverence. Feedback travels only when the gate has light on both sides.
Tagline: “Silence isn’t refusal—it’s protection of sacred voice while the gate is still fogged.”
Definition: A holy pause before answering a request that might not be safe
Systems love to ask for feedback they’re not ready to receive. The trauma-aware soul knows this and breathes first. Feedback on Feedback is that pause—the Spirit-led examination of motive, timing, and power. It asks, “Is this question born of truth or optics?” Only when honesty outweighs control does the voice proceed.
Tagline: “I can give you feedback—but first, let’s talk about your need to collect it.”
Definition: The embodied instinct to stay powered—preparedness as pastoral memory.
This practice isn’t paranoia; it’s remembrance. The charger in the bag is a tiny liturgy of refusal—of ever being left powerless again. It’s how the trauma-formed carry faith through logistics. What others call over-prepared is actually co-regulation in disguise: the body remembering the night it went dark and vowing never to let that happen again. Charger-in-Hand Theology redeems readiness from anxiety into devotion.
Tagline: “3 % is how you get stuck in stairwells. That’s why I carry the charger.”
Companion entry:Field Ethic of Redirected Provision
Definition: Letting provision flow through you, not stop with you.
In presence-led mission, resources are never trophies; they’re transfers. Money, honour, or food offered to the field-holder moves quietly toward the unseen. This is not about charity or refusal of care—it’s about integrity. Empire keeps what it can measure; Presence redirects what it cannot own. The charger becomes current for another.
Tagline: “If they’re holding Scripture alone in a field, let them eat first.”
Definition: Choosing nearness over evidence; refusing to turn Presence into performance.
The trauma-formed are often asked to demonstrate healing—to speak tidy or appear whole. But the Presence of God doesn’t arrive as verification. It arrives as companionship. Presence Before Proof is the refusal to convert experience into evidence. It’s the courage to let God stay without spectacle, to trust that being seen is enough.
Definition: The moment identity is spoken into the ache before belief returns.
When trauma rewires language, even kindness can sound like control. The Naming Gate is where Jesus speaks your name not as command, but as location—so you know you still exist in the sentence. The body flinches before it receives, because names once carried fear. Here, they begin to carry safety. To pass through this gate is not to perform readiness; it’s to let the word land without earning it.
Definition: The one who holds silence until it steadies, refusing urgency as ministry.
The Waiting Witness is the disciple who listens longer than comfort allows. They resist the need to fix, trusting revelation to arrive when safety ripens. Their stillness isn’t withdrawal; it’s faith in slow incarnation. The Waiting Witness doesn’t rush resurrection—they guard the tomb until breath moves again.
Definition: Faith measured by continuity of care rather than argument.
Theology of Staying is the spiritual practice of endurance. It names steadfastness as sacred. Where performance-driven faith hurries toward outcomes, this theology waits, listening through failure until trust reappears. Staying becomes its own proclamation: God is like this—unmoved, patient, here.
Definition: The order of Jesus—welcome first, understanding later.
Belonging Before Belief reverses the empire’s order of worth. It welcomes people into relationship before testing their theology. It trusts that formation happens through contact, not compliance. When survivors are received before they can explain themselves, shame loses its logic. This is how the Kingdom grows: inclusion that teaches faith by experience of love.
Definition: Gold discovered through presence, not persuasion.
Companionship Theology measures truth by relationship that endures confusion. It believes the gospel’s credibility lies in consistency—the friend who stays, the teacher who listens, the God who doesn’t withdraw. Argument may impress, but companionship converts. This is theology in flesh: revelation through reliability.
Definition: The trauma-born urge to demand evidence of safety before trusting love.
Proof Anxiety is the nervous system’s need to verify affection before it can rest. It’s what makes kindness feel suspicious, silence unbearable, and peace unsafe. This reflex doesn’t mean faith is absent—it means the body still remembers betrayal. Proof Anxiety keeps asking for certificates where presence is already the answer. Healing begins when we stop interrogating mercy and allow gentleness to prove itself through time, not argument.
Definition: When peace itself becomes the proof trauma once demanded.
Safety as Evidence is what happens when the body finally believes that calm can be trusted. No testimony is stronger than breath that lengthens and muscles that release. This is theology at a cellular level—the peace of Christ measured not in words but in regulation. When presence feels reliable enough for the body to rest, faith has already happened. Proof has become experience.
Definition: Eating in shared rhythm where breath, laughter, and food regulate the body as one communal heartbeat.
A Co-Regulation Meal is formation disguised as fellowship. Around the table, nervous systems begin to mirror calm, matching tone and pace until trust returns. Silence between bites becomes part of liturgy; laughter breaks frozen places that sermons never reach. In traumaneutic practice, the facilitator doesn’t lead the conversation — they host safety. Bread replaces agenda. When bodies breathe together over food, mission becomes communion again.
Tagline: Bread is the easiest way to teach presence.
If something here speaks to you — whether it’s joining a survivor field-reading group, the training, the theological work, or simply the atmosphere of the field — you’re welcome to reach out. We don’t use sign-ups or funnels; Traumaneutics® is relational, not extractive. People are not lists to us. Everything begins in presence, in conversation, in the gentle way connection forms. If you feel drawn, just get in touch. That’s the doorway.
For Conversation, Questions or Connection
You do not have to arrive fluent, fixed or brave. Write as you are. They don't need to be tidy- just honest enough for presence to find. Questions, stories or a quick hello- all belong here.
We usually reply within a few days, we respond with care at human pace. Whether your walking with your own story, journeying with survivors, writing theology or simply wondering where to begin this space is open
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Messages are sent securely through Webflow and used only for correspondence.
